AMD E2 9000 Recensie | 78 Gegevens vergelijking

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 5 architecture, featuring 104MB of cache to eliminate gaming bottlenecks. It delivers substantial performance with a 4.7 GHz base clock and single-core speeds comparable to Intel's top-tier competition. Pros include an average 11% gaming uplift over the 7800X3D—with some titles exceeding 20%—and improved productivity performance with high power efficiency, often operating below 95W

The AMD E2-9000 is an entry-level, dual-core Stoney Ridge APU with "Excavator" cores, designed for thin and light budget laptops. Running at 1.8-2.2 GHz, this processor is intended for basic computing needs, utilizing integrated Radeon R2 graphics suitable only for light, non-demanding tasks. A primary advantage is its 10W TDP, allowing for fanless, quiet designs, while supporting modern DDR4 memory. However, it suffers from significant performance limitations, leading to frequent system lag and sluggishness in daily tasks. It struggles with multitasking, and even upgrades like SSDs offer limited relief as the CPU remains a bottleneck. For a detailed breakdown of specifications and performance, visit NotebookCheck.

The AMD E2-9000 is an entry-level "Stoney Ridge" APU for budget notebooks, featuring two cores with a 1.8 GHz base clock and a 2.2 GHz boost, suitable for basic computing. Its primary pros include a very low 10-Watt TDP, enabling use in fanless laptops, and an integrated Radeon R2 GPU capable of modern video decoding. However, the processor suffers from exceptionally low benchmark performance, causing significant lag in Windows 10 and limitations due to a single-channel memory controller and 28nm architecture. For more details, visit AMD E2-9000 Benchmarks - Geekbench Browser.

The AMD E2-9000 is a 2017 entry-level, dual-core Stoney Ridge APU with a 1.8 GHz base clock (2.2 GHz boost) and AMD Radeon R2 graphics. Built on a 28nm process with a 10W TDP, it supports DDR4-1866 memory and H.265 decoding, targeting budget, fanless laptops. Performance-wise, the chip yields a PassMark score of approximately 971, placing it in the lowest performance tier, yet it offers decent energy efficiency for basic productivity tasks. Its primary pro is its low power consumption, suitable for thin, mobile designs. Conversely, the main cons are its severely limited multi-threaded performance and an outdated 28nm architecture that often underperforms compared to competing Celeron models. While consistent for basic use, the 2C/2G configuration struggles with heavy multitasking. Detailed benchmark data is available at cpubenchmark.net.