Samsung Galaxy Tab Cdma (2GB + 16GB) Recensie | 168 Gegevens vergelijking

The Samsung Galaxy Tab is identified as a portable 7-inch competitor to the iPad, featuring dual cameras, a responsive 1,024x600 Gorilla Glass screen, Adobe Flash support, and microSD expansion. While its size is ideal for portability, the device functions largely like a large Android smartphone, hampered by the Android 2.2 OS which lacked apps optimized for larger screens at launch. Despite robust performance with 3G and GPS, the high price, required two-year contracts, and fast battery drain when using features simultaneously limit its appeal compared to the mature iPad ecosystem.

PhoneArena's review of the U.S. Samsung Galaxy Tab highlights its 7-inch, 600x1024 resolution screen and compact, lightweight plastic construction as key design positives. The tablet is lauded for its high portability, offering a more pocketable Android experience compared to the Apple iPad, alongside excellent battery life and dual cameras for video chat. Despite supporting Flash Player 10.1 for full web browsing, the device suffers from sluggish browser performance and limited tablet-optimized Android applications. While featuring robust connectivity options like 3G and GPS, the high cost of ownership (ranging from $400-$650) makes it a significant investment. Ultimately deemed an "expensive toy" by the reviewer, the device is considered a solid, albeit costly, choice for media consumption while awaiting better-optimized market alternatives.

The HotHardware review of the 7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab highlights it as a highly portable, responsive alternative to larger tablets, featuring a bright, crisp display with great viewing angles. Powered by a 1GHz Hummingbird processor, the device demonstrated impressive speed during tasks like web browsing, multimedia playback, and gaming. Key physical advantages included its thin, lightweight design, which made for easy one-handed operation. The review praised the hardware, specifically highlighting the dual cameras (1.3MP front, 3MP rear), a microSD slot for expandable storage, and solid, high-quality audio from the internal speaker. Furthermore, benchmark tests in the review showed the tablet leading or nearly leading in CPU and JavaScript performance tests against its peers. Despite these strengths, the review notes the 7-inch form factor might be a downside for users who prefer larger screens, potentially feeling too close to a smartphone experience. The overall value proposition was heavily dependent on user preference for high portability versus the larger screen real estate found on competitors like the iPad.

Walt Mossberg’s November 2010 review of the 7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab highlights its high portability, one-handed usability, and sharp 1024x600 resolution as a genuine competitor to the iPad. Key advantages include dual cameras (front and rear) and support for Adobe Flash 10.1, which enables full web browsing, along with a removable memory card slot for storage expansion. However, the device suffers from a less fluid interface compared to the iPad, sluggish performance when using Flash, lower battery life (approx. 5.5 hours in tests), and a lack of optimized tablet applications in Android 2.2. The

The Sprint version of the Samsung Galaxy Tab is identified as a highly portable, 7-inch Android competitor to the iPad, featuring a bright TFT display and a 1GHz Hummingbird processor. Pros include its lightweight design, dual cameras, microSD storage, and full Adobe Flash support. However, the review highlights significant cons, including a high $599 no-contract price, poor app scaling due to the smartphone-focused Android 2.2 OS, and a proprietary charging connector.

The Verizon Wireless Samsung Galaxy Tab, physically similar to its counterparts with a black design, features a 7-inch display, a 1GHz processor, and Android 2.2 "Froyo". Pros include high portability, excellent video playback, and a smooth browsing experience with Flash support. However, the device is hindered by significant cons, specifically Verizon's poor software implementation, including the non-functional V CAST apps, and a high $599 no-contract price. Ultimately, while the hardware is solid, the software issues lead to a lower recommendation for this specific carrier version.