Google Pixel 4 (6GB + 64GB) Recensie | 197 Gegevens vergelijking

In a 60-day re-review, Hardware Canucks characterizes the Google Pixel 4 as a polarizing device, praising its top-tier software experience and exceptional camera performance. The device is highlighted for its clean Android interface, useful AI features, and the impressive "Astrophotography" mode, which remains a key selling point despite hardware limitations. Hardware CanucksHowever, the review criticizes the hardware for lagging behind 2019 competitors, specifically citing the lack of an ultra-wide camera, slow 18W charging, and insufficient 64GB base storage. Furthermore, the 90Hz "Smooth Display" is noted for its inconsistent refresh rate, and the battery life is described as a major drawback. The final verdict advises against purchasing the smaller Pixel 4 due to its "terrible" battery, recommending the larger Pixel 4 XL only for users prioritizing camera performance. Ultimately, the review deems the phone's launch price too high, suggesting it is only worth buying after significant price reductions.

Ben Sin's Forbes review describes the 2019 Google Pixel 4 as a device with exceptional software, a superior 90Hz OLED screen, and an industry-leading camera, particularly with improved Night Sight. However, the review highlights critical, "user-hostile" hardware limitations, including poor battery life from the 2,800 mAh cell and the lack of an ultra-wide lens. Ultimately, while the refined Android 10 experience and build quality are praised, the, 64GB base storage and subpar battery make it hard to recommend over competitors.

Rene Ritchie's review for iMore highlights the Google Pixel 4’s cohesive design, praising its matte finish, fast Face Unlock, and smooth 90Hz display, which marks a shift toward a more Apple-like, "singular object" feel. While the computational photography, particularly the Super Res Zoom and live HDR+ preview, is described as industry-leading, the review points out the lack of an ultra-wide lens and the absence of 4K 60fps video as significant cons. Despite these strengths, the device is considered hard to recommend due to poor battery life, limited utility from the Soli-powered Motion Sense, and a reliance on aggressive, often frustrating power management.

The TechRadar review describes the Google Pixel 4 as a powerful, compact flagship with a phenomenal rear camera system featuring Astrophotography and Live HDR+. Key pros include a smooth 90Hz OLED display, clean Android 10 software, and excellent AI-powered imaging performance. However, the device is significantly limited by a small 2,800mAh battery that struggles to last a full day. TechRadarThe phone's design relies on face unlock rather than a fingerprint scanner, and the innovative Motion Sense radar gestures are deemed limited in practical, daily use. While the Snapdragon 855 chipset provides strong performance, the, 64GB base storage is considered low for a flagship, and it lacks the previously offered free unlimited original-quality photo storage. Ultimately, the Pixel 4 is recommended for users prioritizing camera capabilities over battery longevity, according to the analysis. Its combination of excellent camera performance and mediocre battery life makes it a highly specialized, rather than general, recommendation. TechRadar

According to CNBC, the Google Pixel 4 offers an excellent camera, a smooth 90Hz display, and fast Face Unlock, but it falls short of competitors due to poor battery life and a lack of a wide-angle lens. While praising the software and unique Soli radar features, the review notes the phone lacks a headphone jack, offers limited storage, and feels expensive for what it delivers. Ultimately, the review suggests consumers consider the Pixel 3a or iPhone 11 instead. CNBC

The Google Pixel 4 is reviewed as a device balancing high-end features with notable drawbacks. Pros include a class-leading camera with sophisticated AI and astrophotography mode, and a 90Hz Smooth Display P-OLED screen. Cons are the small 2,800mAh battery, a large top bezel, and the removal of the fingerprint scanner in favor of Face Unlock which lacked initial app support. For more details, visit 3G.co.uk.

According to an ITPro review, the Google Pixel 4 is a "clever little phone" with outstanding camera performance and a smooth software experience, featuring a 90Hz display and useful apps like the Recorder. However, these positives are significantly hampered by poor battery life, the absence of a fingerprint sensor in favor of facial recognition, and a modest 64GB of base storage. The review concludes that while the Pixel 4 offers "market-leading software," fundamental issues like battery life and the removal of the fingerprint sensor prevent it from being a clear recommendation, suggesting the more affordable Pixel 3a might offer a better balance. Google Pixel 4£180.00& more prices4.1(1.2k)Google Pixel 3a£189.99& more prices4.6(1.8k)

Wired reviewed the Google Pixel 4, finding it powerful due to Google's software but hampered by hardware issues, citing the pure Android 10 experience, 90Hz display, and Titan M security chip as pros, along with exclusive apps like Recorder. The review highlighted the camera's second telephoto lens and computational photography features like Live HDR+ and Night Sight with Astrophotography as strengths, but noted the lack of an ultra-wide lens as a con. Significant flaws included mediocre battery life, gimmicky Motion Sense gestures, the removal of the fingerprint sensor, and limited 64GB storage without an SD slot.

According to a 2019 review, the Pixel 4 is a solid but ultimately underwhelming "software-first" device with pros including a bright OLED screen, an excellent camera system with a new telephoto lens, and innovative software like automatic voice recorder transcription. However, significant cons include a less secure face scanner compared to the iPhone and a lack of hardware versatility found in competing flagship devices. The review concludes that while the Pixel 4 is best for those prioritizing pure Google software, its price and lack of hardware innovation make it difficult to recommend over rivals.

The Google Pixel 4 is described as having potential but is hindered by poor battery life. Pros include an excellent camera, a 90Hz display, and a compact design, while cons include a lack of third-party Face Unlock support and insufficient screen brightness for direct sunlight. The Guardian concluded that even the lower price couldn't compensate for a phone that struggles to last a full day.

The Google Pixel 4 features a significant design update and a notable 90Hz OLED display. It continues Google's strong camera performance with a new dual-lens setup and exclusive software features like Motion Sense and a real-time transcription Recorder app. However, the device is criticized for limited storage options (max 128GB) and a battery life that falls short of many modern flagships, despite powerful hardware.

Engadget describes the 2019 Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL as ambitious, high-performance devices held back by significant hardware compromises. Pros include a 90Hz "Smooth Display," a fast Face Unlock system using Soli radar, and a refined design with a matte finish. The camera remains a highlight, featuring excellent zoom capabilities, astrophotography mode, and industry-leading software features like on-device Assistant and a real-time transcription recorder. Conversely, critical cons include disappointing battery life that struggles to last a full day and the limited utility of Motion Sense gestures, which do not justify the thick top bezel. The camera setup lacks an ultra-wide-angle lens, and the device removes the secondary wide-angle selfie camera. Additionally, the 64GB base storage and absence of a headphone jack or bundled earbuds detract from the overall value proposition.

According to a review, the Google Pixel 4 XL is an ambitious device prioritizing user experience with a 90Hz "Smooth Display" and fast Face Unlock, enhanced by the Soli radar chip for Motion Sense gestures. While its camera excels at still photos with a new telephoto lens and software like Live HDR+, it notably lacks an ultra-wide lens and struggles with mediocre video quality. Practical drawbacks include middling battery life, limited 64GB base storage without free original-quality Google Photos backups, and a high launch price, making it a challenging recommendation despite a cohesive software experience.